Wells Score for PE
Wells Score for Pulmonary Embolism
Result
Suggested management:
Wells Score Interpretation
Three-level version — Wells et al., Thromb Haemost 2000
| Score | Probability | PE prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| < 2 | Low | ~3.6% |
| 2 to 6 | Moderate | ~20.5% |
| > 6 | High | ~66.7% |
Dichotomised version — van Belle et al. (Christopher Study), JAMA 2006
| Score | Classification | Management |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 4 | PE unlikely | D-dimer; if negative, PE excluded |
| > 4 | PE likely | CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) directly |
Note: The Wells Score is a risk stratification tool that must be used alongside clinical judgement. It does not replace individualised medical assessment. In high-probability patients, empirical anticoagulation may be considered whilst awaiting imaging if the bleeding risk is acceptable.
References
- 1. Wells PS, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(3):416–20. PubMed ↗
- 2. van Belle A, et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-Dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006;295(2):172–9. PubMed ↗