Wells Score for PE
Wells Score for Pulmonary Embolism
Result
Suggested management:
Wells Score Interpretation
Three-level version — Wells et al., Thromb Haemost 2000
| Score | Probability | PE prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| < 2 | Low | ~3.6% |
| 2 to 6 | Moderate | ~20.5% |
| > 6 | High | ~66.7% |
Dichotomized version — van Belle et al. (Christopher Study), JAMA 2006
| Score | Classification | Management |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 4 | PE unlikely | D-dimer; if negative, PE excluded |
| > 4 | PE likely | CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) directly |
Note: The Wells Score is a risk stratification tool that must be used alongside clinical judgment. It does not replace individualized medical assessment. In high-probability patients, empirical anticoagulation may be considered while awaiting imaging if the bleeding risk is acceptable. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Heart Association (AHA) endorse clinical decision rules including the Wells Score as part of structured PE evaluation pathways in the emergency setting.
References
- 1. Wells PS, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(3):416–20. PubMed ↗
- 2. van Belle A, et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-Dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006;295(2):172–9. PubMed ↗